Medical Sat Calculus History Crj320 Strayer Impor

Medical Sat Calculus History Crj320 Strayer Impor

  1. Assignment 3: The Big Stage!
    Due Week 10 and worth 200 points

    In the United States, both the federal government and the states have authority to indict for criminal wrongdoing. The federal government and each state have their own criminal statutes, court system, prosecutors, and police agencies. Use your textbook, the Internet, and/or Strayer University Online Library (https://research.strayer.edu) to research articles from within the past three years on crime trial, prosecutor, and criminal investigator.

    Write a 4- to 5-page paper in which you:

    1. Put yourself in the role of a prosecutor and explain the importance of the final report to the prosecution of a case. Further, analyze the possible impact of poorly completed final reports on the prosecution of a case.
    2. Review Figure 21.1, The Use of Evidence in the Stages of the Criminal Justice Process, in Chapter 21 of the text and specify the manner in which each stage of the criminal justice process helps to build a successfully litigated action. Provide a rationale to support the response.
    3. Identify the three areas that Detective Richard Gautsch, a seasoned investigator, recommends an investigator focus on when giving courtroom testimony and discuss the importance of each area. Next, define a criminal investigator’s role in preparing a case for court. Analyze the manner in which the investigator cooperates with the prosecutor to enhance the courtroom presentation.
    4. Differentiate not guilty and acquitted. Give your opinion as to whether or not a not guilty verdict means that the investigator failed. Support the position.
    5. Predict one to two changes that will take place in criminal investigation in the next twenty years. Provide a rationale to support the response.
    6. Use at least three quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar types of websites do not qualify as academic resources.

    Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

    • This course requires the use of new Strayer Writing Standards (SWS). The format is different than other Strayer University courses. Please take a moment to review the SWS documentation for details.
    • Be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow SWS or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
    • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

    The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

    • Describe the major components of and responsibilities involved in the investigative process.
    • Recommend improvements to the criminal investigation process in selected areas.
    • Predict changes that will take place in criminal investigation in the next twenty (20) years.
    • Evaluate the role of the criminal investigator in preparing evidence for presentation and courtroom testimony.
    • Use technology and information resources to conduct research in the criminal investigation process.
    • Write clearly and concisely about the criminal investigation process using proper writing mechanics.

    Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Name: CRJ320 Week 10 Assignment 3: The Big Stage!

Unacceptable Below 60% F Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D Fair 70-79% C Proficient 80-89% B Exemplary 90-100% A
CRJ320-A3-1
1. Put yourself in the role of a prosecutor and explain the importance of the final report to the prosecution of a case. Further, analyze the possible impact of poorly completed final reports on the prosecution of a case.

Weight: 15%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 17.98 (8.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely put yourself in the role of a prosecutor and explain the importance of the final report to the prosecution of a case. Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the possible impact of poorly completed final reports on the prosecution of a case.
Points Range:18 (9%) – 20.98 (10.49%)
Insufficiently put yourself in the role of a prosecutor and explain the importance of the final report to the prosecution of a case. Insufficiently analyzed the possible impact of poorly completed final reports on the prosecution of a case.
Points Range:21 (10.5%) – 23.98 (11.99%)
Partially put yourself in the role of a prosecutor and explain the importance of the final report to the prosecution of a case. Partially analyzed the possible impact of poorly completed final reports on the prosecution of a case.
Points Range:24 (12%) – 26.98 (13.49%)
Satisfactorily put yourself in the role of a prosecutor and explain the importance of the final report to the prosecution of a case. Satisfactorily analyzed the possible impact of poorly completed final reports on the prosecution of a case.
Points Range:27 (13.5%) – 30 (15%)
Thoroughly put yourself in the role of a prosecutor and explain the importance of the final report to the prosecution of a case. Thoroughly analyzed the possible impact of poorly completed final reports on the prosecution of a case.
2. Review Figure 21.1, The Use of Evidence in the Stages of the Criminal Justice Process, in Chapter 21 of the text and specify the manner in which each stage of the criminal justice process helps to build a successfully litigated action. Provide a rationale to support the response.

Weight: 20%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 23.98 (11.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely reviewed Figure 21.1 “The Use of Evidence in the Stages of the Criminal Justice Process” in Chapter 21 of the text; did not submit or incompletely specified the manner in which each stage of the criminal justice process helps to build a successfully litigated action. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support your response.
Points Range:24 (12%) – 27.98 (13.99%)
Insufficiently reviewed Figure 21.1 “The Use of Evidence in the Stages of the Criminal Justice Process” in Chapter 21 of the text; insufficiently specified the manner in which each stage of the criminal justice process helps to build a successfully litigated action. Insufficiently provided a rationale to support your response.
Points Range:28 (14%) – 31.98 (15.99%)
Partially reviewed Figure 21.1 “The Use of Evidence in the Stages of the Criminal Justice Process” in Chapter 21 of the text; partially specified the manner in which each stage of the criminal justice process helps to build a successfully litigated action. Partially provided a rationale to support your response.
Points Range:32 (16%) – 35.98 (17.99%)
Satisfactorily reviewed Figure 21.1 “The Use of Evidence in the Stages of the Criminal Justice Process” in Chapter 21 of the text; satisfactorily specified the manner in which each stage of the criminal justice process helps to build a successfully litigated action. Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support your response.
Points Range:36 (18%) – 40 (20%)
Thoroughly reviewed Figure 21.1 “The Use of Evidence in the Stages of the Criminal Justice Process” in Chapter 21 of the text; thoroughly specified the manner in which each stage of the criminal justice process helps to build a successfully litigated action. Thoroughly provided a rationale to support your response.
3. Identify the three areas that Detective Richard Gautsch recommends an investigator focus on when giving courtroom testimony and discuss the importance of each area. Next, define a criminal investigator’s role in preparing a case for court. Analyze the manner in which the investigator cooperates with the prosecutor to enhance the courtroom presentation.

Weight: 15%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 17.98 (8.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely identified the three areas that Detective Richard Gautsch recommends an investigator focus on when giving courtroom testimony and discussed the importance of each area. Did not submit or incompletely defined a criminal investigator’s role in preparing a case for court. Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the manner in which the investigator cooperates with the prosecutor to enhance the courtroom presentation.
Points Range:18 (9%) – 20.98 (10.49%)
Insufficiently identified the three areas that Detective Richard Gautsch recommends an investigator focus on when giving courtroom testimony and discussed the importance of each area. Insufficiently analyzed the manner in which the investigator cooperates with the prosecutor to enhance the courtroom presentation.
Points Range:21 (10.5%) – 23.98 (11.99%)
Partially identified the three areas that Detective Richard Gautsch recommends an investigator focus on when giving courtroom testimony and discussed the importance of each area. Partially defined a criminal investigator’s role in preparing a case for court. Partially analyzed the manner in which the investigator cooperates with the prosecutor to enhance the courtroom presentation.
Points Range:24 (12%) – 26.98 (13.49%)
Satisfactorily identified the three areas that Detective Richard Gautsch recommends an investigator focus on when giving courtroom testimony and discussed the importance of each area. Satisfactorily defined a criminal investigator’s role in preparing a case for court. Satisfactorily analyzed the manner in which the investigator cooperates with the prosecutor to enhance the courtroom presentation.
Points Range:27 (13.5%) – 30 (15%)
Thoroughly identified the three areas that Detective Richard Gautsch recommends an investigator focus on when giving courtroom testimony and discussed the importance of each area. Thoroughly defined a criminal investigator’s role in preparing a case for court. Thoroughly analyzed the manner in which the investigator cooperates with the prosecutor to enhance the courtroom presentation.
CRJ320-A3-4
4. Differentiate not guilty and acquitted. Give your opinion as to whether or not an acquittal means that the investigator failed. Support your position.

Weight: 20%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 23.98 (11.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely differentiated not guilty and acquitted. Did not submit or incompletely gave your opinion as to whether or not an acquittal means that the investigator failed. Did not submit or incompletely supported your position.
Points Range:24 (12%) – 27.98 (13.99%)
Insufficiently differentiated not guilty and acquitted. Insufficiently gave your opinion as to whether or not an acquittal means that the investigator failed. Insufficiently supported your position.
Points Range:28 (14%) – 31.98 (15.99%)
Partially differentiated not guilty and acquitted. Partially gave your opinion as to whether or not an acquittal means that the investigator failed. Partially supported your position.
Points Range:32 (16%) – 35.98 (17.99%)
Satisfactorily differentiated not guilty and acquitted. Satisfactorily gave your opinion as to whether or not an acquittal means that the investigator failed. Satisfactorily supported your position.
Points Range:36 (18%) – 40 (20%)
Thoroughly differentiated not guilty and acquitted. Thoroughly gave your opinion as to whether or not an acquittal means that the investigator failed. Thoroughly supported your position.
5. Predict one to two changes that will take place in criminal investigation in the next twenty years. Provide a rationale to support the response.

Weight: 15%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 17.98 (8.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely predicted one to two changes that will take place in criminal investigation in the next twenty years. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support the response.
Points Range:18 (9%) – 20.98 (10.49%)
Insufficiently predicted one to two changes that will take place in criminal investigation in the next twenty years. Insufficiently provided a rationale to support the response.
Points Range:21 (10.5%) – 23.98 (11.99%)
Partially predicted one to two changes that will take place in criminal investigation in the next twenty years. Partially provided a rationale to support the response.
Points Range:24 (12%) – 26.98 (13.49%)
Satisfactorily predicted one to two changes that will take place in criminal investigation in the next twenty years. Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support the response.
Points Range:27 (13.5%) – 30 (15%)
Thoroughly predicted one to two changes that will take place in criminal investigation in the next twenty years. Thoroughly provided a rationale to support the response.
6. Cite three references.

Weight: 5%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 5.98 (2.99%)
No references provided.
Points Range:6 (3%) – 6.98 (3.49%)
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.
Points Range:7 (3.5%) – 7.98 (3.99%)
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.
Points Range:8 (4%) – 8.98 (4.49%)
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
Points Range:9 (4.5%) – 10 (5%)
Exceeds number of requi

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool’s honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: FINAL PAPER

1

Final paper
Name
Institution Affiliation
Date

FINAL PAPER

2
Assignment 3: The Big Stage!

The importance of the final report to the prosecution of a case
The final report is aimed at convincing the judge why the case should go to trial.
Therefore, prosecutors are obligated to ensure that the final report is prepared with extreme
caution. The contents of the final report make it crucial in convincing the jud ge to allow the
case to go to trial. When preparing the final report, I would ensure that I have all the details
about the case. These details include crime scene information and the links between the main
suspect and the crime or the victim.
The final report should clearly explain the evidence that is available for the case, thus
proving why the case should go to trial. Therefore, the final report should contain details of
any critical evidence that requires preservation for the case to go to trial. If mishandled, this
evidence might be tampered with or mishandles thus revoking their credibility. Additionally,
the report should entail the investigation that has already been done and speculates on any other
investigation that should be done.
The final report is also important since it outlines all the details about past criminal
offenses committed by the suspect. These offenses may bring out a sequence of activities done
by the suspect, or they may bring about a motive for the offense. Additionally, the report
outlines if the suspect has previously been convicted of any crime and if he or she is under
probation or parole. These details and other pieces of evidence are crucial while profiling a
suspect, thus ensuring that the right sus…


Anonymous
Really helpful material, saved me a great deal of time.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
Similar Content
Related Tags