By 11:59 PM on Monday, post an opinion piece (min 500 words) on whether Sam Harris and Natural Law theory sufficiency establish an objective ethics? Is he correct to think that there are objective ways of looking at how people should behave and that we may, for example, condemn as objectively wrong, forced marriages, for example?
For those students who argued against ethical subjectivism/skepticism in the last module, your response/discussion post may be a refinement of your argument. You must respond to at least one classmate’s post (min 250 words) due by 11:59 PM on Wednesday. You must respond to any classmate who comments on your post.