Stumbling Toward Universal Health Wilmington Univ
Appraise the future of the Affordable Care Act. As part of your paper, please identify and discuss any major: policy factors, political factors, judicial factors, interest groups actions, and historical factors. Conclude with your analysis and prediction of the future of the ACA.
You can use the sources provided and you are encouraged to use sources you identify as well. APA format required.
Length: 5 to 7 pages.
Resources:
Rubric
Reflection Rubric
Reflection Rubric
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePreparation
|
| 25.0 to >23.0 pts
Distinguished
Reflection entry shows evidence of thorough preparation through reading or reflection. Author speaks as one who has knowledge to share.
|
23.0 to >20.75 pts
Proficient
Reflection entry shows evidence of preparation through reading or reflection. Author speaks as one who has knowledge to share.
|
20.75 to >18.75 pts
Satisfactory
Reflection entry shows some evidence of preparation through reading or reflection. Author demonstrates some knowledge applicable to prompt.
|
18.75 to >16.25 pts
Marginal
Reflection entry shows little evidence of preparation through reading or reflection.
|
16.25 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Reflection entry shows no evidence of preparation through reading or reflection.
|
|
25.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of content
|
| 25.0 to >23.0 pts
Distinguished
Reflection entry contains exceptionally thorough and substantial information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s) completely.
|
23.0 to >20.75 pts
Proficient
Reflection entry contains substantial information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s).
|
20.75 to >18.75 pts
Satisfactory
Reflection entry contains some relevant information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s).
|
18.75 to >16.25 pts
Marginal
Reflection entry contains minimal information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s) weakly.
|
16.25 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Reflection entry contains minimal information for reader. The entry does not address the focus question(s).
|
|
25.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonal reflection
|
| 25.0 to >23.0 pts
Distinguished
Reflection entry conveys extensive evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s); demonstrates the author’s growth through reflection on learning.
|
23.0 to >20.75 pts
Proficient
Reflection entry conveys evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s); demonstrates the author is capable of reflecting on learning.
|
20.75 to >18.75 pts
Satisfactory
Reflection entry conveys evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s) with a few gaps in clarity; demonstrates the author is capable of some reflection on learning.
|
18.75 to >16.25 pts
Marginal
Reflection entry conveys little evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s).
|
16.25 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Reflection entry shows no personal response to the focus question(s).
|
|
25.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConventions
|
| 25.0 to >23.0 pts
Distinguished
Reflection entry shows few, if any errors in standard written English that do not interfered with understanding.
|
23.0 to >20.75 pts
Proficient
Reflection entry may have some errors in standard written English that rarely interfere with understanding.
|
20.75 to >18.75 pts
Satisfactory
Reflection entry has a few errors in standard written English that may interfere with understanding.
|
18.75 to >16.25 pts
Marginal
Reflection entry has several kinds of errors in standard written English that interfere with understanding.
|
16.25 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Reflection entry has frequent and severe errors in standard written English that interfere with understanding.
|
|
25.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100.0
|
