Specific Professional Ethics Code Final Group Ca

Specific Professional Ethics Code Final Group Ca

ok so I have to answer 2 questions from this entire assignment. I need good work not vague words etc to copy paste from internet. ! I need Q1 and q2

1. Identify the problem or dilemma

What is the tension – dilemma – competing issue? The tension (dilemma/competing issues) could be a function of ethics vs. laws, ethics vs. institutional policies, ethics vs. a community norm, or any of those vs. professional behavior

• Dilemma (2-3 sentence brief description)

2. Identify ethical principles, personal values and/or moral conflicts.

Identify the most important principle or principles (Autonomy, Nonmaleficence, Beneficence, Justice, Fidelity, or Veracity) associated with the dilemma and justify your selection. If there is more than one relevant principle are these in conflict or complimentary? Are there any personal values that this dilemma introduces?

FINAL GROUP ETHICS CASE STUDY

Directions: This case study is a group assignment that each group will complete independently. Each step of the outline of the eight step model below needs to be addressed for full credit. The eight-step model format outlined below (i.e., Outline: Eight Step Ethical Decision-Making Model). This outline is a modification of the problem solving model proposed on pages 24 to 26 of the course textbook. Answers to the ethics case study should be divided into the headings indicated in the bold italics; type face. The “bullet points’ must be full sentences that communicate your answer clearly and succinctly.

The group’s response to the ethics case study will generally follow APA format. The response should be 3 to 4 double spaced pages, in a Times New Roman, 12 point font. The paper should have 1” margins and page numbers with an abbreviated running head. Your submission will have a cover page that has the information specified by the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Be sure to read the attached grading matrix to meet all graded criteria.

OUTLINE: EIGHT STEP ETHICAL DECISION-MAKING MODEL

1. Identify the problem or dilemma

What is the tension – dilemma – competing issue? The tension (dilemma/competing issues) could be a function of ethics vs. laws, ethics vs. institutional policies, ethics vs. a community norm, or any of those vs. professional behavior

• Dilemma (2-3 sentence brief description)

2. Identify ethical principles, personal values and/or moral conflicts.

Identify the most important principle or principles (Autonomy, Nonmaleficence, Beneficence, Justice, Fidelity, or Veracity) associated with the dilemma and justify your selection. If there is more than one relevant principle are these in conflict or complimentary? Are there any personal values that this dilemma introduces?

3. Relevant APA ethics code (site the specific professional ethics code).

Site specific guidance from the relevant professional ethical code (ACA, APA, ASMHC will be the codes that are available to you).

4. Applicable laws and regulations.

State any relevant IL state codes, statutes, case law, administrative policy, or federal guidelines?

5. Seek consultation and consider what would successfully resolve this this dilemma.

A consultant will give you a more objective view on the dilemma. Who would be most appropriate to consult with for this dilemma (e.g., a lawyer, a clinical peer, a specialist)? What would constitute successful resolution of the dilemma?

6. Possible Course(s) of action

Identify and describe two or more different possible courses of action that are viable. Please note that a consultant is not a course of action

7. Enumerate the consequences of various decisions

Describe the limitations and potential legal and ethical consequences associated with each course of action that you identify.

8. Recommended course of action.

Choose the best course of action. Justify how your recommendation(s) is in the best interest of the client and satisfies the legal/ethical/professional behavior dilemma. Include the possible ethical or licensing