Properly Cited Sources Using Week 1 Hc 310

By /

Properly Cited Sources Using Week 1 Hc 310

Unit 1 Assignment – Building a Consumer Psychological and Cultural Profile

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 40
  • Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Instructions

In the New Shoes simulation you will be marketing to three different target markets (home, domestic, and foreign). It becomes important to understand the consumer psychological and cultural profile for each market.

Create a PowerPoint presentation to present to the marketing team of your New Shoes company to present a profile for your New Shoes consumer for the domestic and foreign markets using the criteria below.

  1. When Creating your Cultural Profile include the following elements:
    1. Cultural Types
    2. Subculture
    3. Social class
    4. Communication (verbal and non verbal) that can impact the Marketing process
    5. Social ( networks, family, roles and status)
    6. Personal (age and life cycle stage, occupation, economics, lifestyle, personality)
  2. When Creating Your Psychological Profile include the following elements:
    1. Consumer Perception of the product/service
    2. Why do consumers purchase this particular product/service? (motivation)
    3. What are your consumers’ needs, wants, desires, and fears?
    4. What are your consumers’ beliefs and values that may influence the purchase?

    Your PowerPoint presentation should be at least 8 slides in length (not including the Title page and Reference page). Ensure that your sources are properly cited using APA formatted guidelines and include professional graphics. An example of a successful reference slide with several web pages and an academic journal article is linked below.

    You may also use the required and supplementary resources from this unit.

    Assignment Parameters

    1. Accurate description and reference of all concepts and theories learned from course material.
    2. Practical examples of concepts that lead to continuing interest in the topic.
    3. Synthesis of concepts and theories from other course activities.
    4. Well-organized, clearly presented work ( free from excessive spelling and grammatical errors)
    5. Properly cited sources using APA 6th edition.
    6. Ensure use of the assignment rubric.

    Assignment Objectives

    • Examine how psychological as well as cultural factors influence consumer buying behavior.
    • Apply these factors when creating a marketing strategy for a product or service.

    Assignment Files

    Rubric

    BU220 Unit 1 Assignment – Building a Consumer Psychological and Cultural Profile

    BU220 Unit 1 Assignment – Building a Consumer Psychological and Cultural Profile
    Criteria Ratings Pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis of Knowledge
    8.0 pts

    5

    Connects and extends knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

    		 4.0 pts

    4

    Analyzes knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline making relevant connections to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

    		 3.0 pts

    3

    Begins to connect knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline to civic engagement and to tone’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

    		 2.0 pts

    2

    Begins to identify knowledge (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline that is relevant to civic engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

    		 1.0 pts

    1

    There Is some evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline that is somewhat relevant to civics engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

    		 0.0 pts

    0

    There is little to no evidence that knowledge is identified (facts, theories, etc.) from one’s own academic study/ field/ discipline that is somewhat relevant to civics engagement and to one’s own participation in civic life, politics, and government.

    8.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDefines Content
    8.0 pts

    5

    Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

    		 7.0 pts

    4

    Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed

    		 6.0 pts

    3

    Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

    		 5.0 pts

    2

    Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

    		 4.0 pts

    1

    Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.

    		 0.0 pts

    0

    There is no evidence of a defined statement.

    8.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelationship to research
    8.0 pts

    5

    Evaluates materials for scholarly significance and relevance within and/or across the various disciplines, evaluating them according to their contributions and consequences.

    		 7.0 pts

    4

    Examines materials for scholarly significance within and/or across the various disciplines to explore contributions in relation to important questions.

    		 6.0 pts

    3

    Uses materials in the context of scholarship to develop a foundation of disciplinary knowledge and to raise and explore important questions.

    		 5.0 pts

    2

    Engages materials with the intention and expectation of building topical and world knowledge.

    		 4.0 pts

    1

    Approaches materials in the context of assignments with the intention and expectation of finding right answers and learning facts and concepts to display for credit.

    		 0.0 pts

    0

    There is little to no evidence of engagement with outside materials used in a scholarly manner.

    8.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion and related Outcomes
    12.0 pts

    5

    Conclusions (consequences and implications) are logical and reflect informed evaluation and the ability to place evidence and perspectives discussed in priority order.

    		 11.0 pts

    4

    Conclusions are logically tied to and reflect student’s informed evaluation in priority order and are clearly identified.

    		 10.0 pts

    3

    Conclusion is logically tied to a range of information and are identified clearly.

    		 9.0 pts

    2

    Conclusion is logically tied to information (because information is chosen to fit the desired conclusion).

    		 8.0 pts

    1

    Conclusion is inconsistently tied to some of the information discussed and oversimplified.

    		 0.0 pts

    0

    Conclusion is either not present, unclear, or does not reflect the information presented.

    12.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
    2.0 pts

    5

    The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

    		 1.8 pts

    4

    The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling and minor error do not impair the flow of communication.

    		 1.6 pts

    3

    The paper exhibits an acceptable command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

    		 1.4 pts

    2

    The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

    		 1.2 pts

    1

    The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

    		 0.0 pts

    0

    The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

    2.0 pts

    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
    2.0 pts

    5

    The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

    		 1.8 pts

    4

    The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

    		 1.6 pts

    3

    The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

    		 1.4 pts

    2

    The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

    		 1.2 pts

    1

    Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

    		 0.0 pts

    0

    There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

    2.0 pts

    Total Points: 40.0

    PreviousNext