Revision Analysis
Part 1
In the tables below, list the details provided in your feedback from different sources: your instructor, WritePoint®, Plagiarism Checker, and your peers. In the second column, explain what changes you will make to your paper based on that feedback. Address one specific area of feedback in each row.
Example:
|
Feedback Received |
Revisions to Make Based on That Feedback |
|
1. My instructor indicated that my research paper should not be written in first person. |
I will review each page of my paper and remove the use of first person. I will rewrite each sentence properly in third person. I will also review the material in the Center for Writing Excellence that will help me better understand how to use third person correctly. |
Instructor Feedback
|
Feedback Received |
Revisions to Make Based on That Feedback |
|
1. |
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
|
WritePoint® Feedback
|
Feedback Received |
Revisions to Make Based on That Feedback |
|
1. |
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
|
|
5. |
|
Plagiarism Checker
|
Feedback Received |
Revisions to Make Based on That Feedback |
|
1. |
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
|
Peer Feedback
|
Feedback Received |
Revisions to Make Based on That Feedback |
|
1. |
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
|
Part 2:
In a new Microsoft® Word document,writea 300- to 400-word response to the following:
· Describe, in detail, the feedback you received from WritePoint®, from the Plagiarism Checker report through the Center for Writing Excellence, from your facilitator, and from any peers in a peer-review thread.
· Explain the changes you will make to revise your own paper based on this feedback.
· In your response, explain whether you have met each item listed above. If you answered yes, explain what you have done in your paper to meet these criteria. If you responded no, explain what changes you will make to successfully complete that requirement before submitting your final draft.
· Respond to every item in the checklist.
Add a correctly formatted title page.