Kaiser Family Foundationrobert Wood Part 2 Policy
To complete the Assignment, select a recent (within the last 5 years) health care policy that has had substantial impact on consumers. In particular, look at a high-impact health care policy to analyze the diverse and divergent perspectives that informed its development and then assess its impact at the local organizational level.
Detailed and current information on health care policy may be found on many websites, including the following:
- American Hospital Association (AHA)
- Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
- The Kaiser Family Foundation
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF)
- American Public Health Association (APHA)
- American Association of Retired Persons (AARP)
After choosing a health care policy, select a local health care organization that is impacted by that policy. This might be a public agency, a health care facility, or any organization substantially influenced by the policy. It also might be the health care organization in which you work. As an administrator in this organization, you have been tasked with preparing an assessment of the impact of the policy on the organization’s operations and outcomes. This task requires you to take a large and complex topic (the policy) and synthesize it into digestible information that organizational stakeholders can strategically use to address issues raised by the policy.
For Part 1 of this assessment, you will create a PowerPoint presentation that explains key points related to the health care policy you selected. This presentation is designed to inform and precede the dissemination of an in-depth policy assessment regarding the impact of the policy on the organization.
For Part 2, you will write an in-depth policy assessment that synthesizes the impact of the health care policy on the organization.
Part 1: PowerPoint Presentation: Key Points of a Health Care Policy
Succinct but accurate dissemination of information is often a key responsibility of a health care administrator, and understanding current changes in health care policy is an important need for many stakeholders within an organization.
For this Assignment, assume the role of a health care administrator and create a PowerPoint presentation to provide stakeholders within the organization foundational information about the policy you selected. In particular, focus on the formulation of the policy and the diverse perspectives of those who had a role in its development. As noted previously, this presentation is designed to inform the subsequent policy assessment you will distribute.
In a 12- to 15-slide PowerPoint presentation:
- Briefly describe the issue addressed by the policy as well as the background of the policy’s formulation.
- Identify key stakeholders involved in the evolution of this policy. Briefly explain the overarching perspectives of these stakeholders with regard to the policy.
- Define which of the stakeholders would be considered advocacy groups and which would be classified as business interests. Explain how you differentiate the two categories and why this differentiation matters.
- Explain the impact of the policy on key stakeholders (not necessarily within the organization). For example, how does the policy impact consumers? A health care organization? An insurance company? Providers?
- Explain the role of various government agencies and officials, including public health agencies, in the formulation and implementation of the policy.
- Explain the ongoing role of law and regulation in the formulation and implementation of the policy.
Part 2: Policy Assessment
Once organizational stakeholders have been given foundational and critical information about the health care policy, you will provide them with a succinct, in-depth assessment of the impact of the policy on the organization.
In a 2- to 3-page executive summary:
- Briefly discuss the relevance of the policy to the organization.
- Explain areas within the organization that will be affected by the policy.
- Identify key organizational stakeholders impacted by this policy. Explain how they will be affected.
- Assess any community impact that will need to be taken into consideration.
- Describe the expected impact of the policy on organizational outcomes.
Part 1: Presentation Content |
46 (36.8%) – 50 (40%) The presentation shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the key points related to a health care policy. |
41 (32.8%) – 45 (36%) The presentation fully addresses the key points related to a health care policy. |
36 (28.8%) – 40 (32%) The presentation lacks depth or clarity of the key points related to a health care policy. |
0 (0%) – 35 (28%) The presentation does not address a health care policy topic, is inaccurate, missing, or is of poor quality. |
---|---|---|---|---|
Presentation Required Elements |
9 (7.2%) – 10 (8%) Presentation follows the Presentation Guidelines and Tips and uses more than four of the following items: text, color contrasts, photos, graphs, maps, websites, or visual elements to convey the information. Presenter notes support the information presented visually. Speaker notes are present/ precise and scholarly in tone. Presentation has the required number of slides. |
8 (6.4%) – 8 (6.4%) Presentation follows the Presentation Guidelines and Tips and uses three to four of the following items: text, color contrasts photos, graphs, maps, websites, or visual elements to convey the information. Presenter notes support the information presented visually. Speaker notes are present/ precise and scholarly in tone. Presentation has the required number of slides. |
7 (5.6%) – 7 (5.6%) Presentation uses only one or two of the following items: text, color contrasts photos, graphs, maps, websites, or visual elements to convey the information. Presenter notes somewhat support the information presented visually. Speaker notes are present but inadequate and lack scholarly tone. Presentation may have less than the required number of slides. |
0 (0%) – 6 (4.8%) Presentation does not use any graphs, color contrasts, photos, or visuals, and information on slides is inadequate and hard to follow. Presenter do not support the information presented visually or the notes are missing. Presentation has a minimal number of slides. |
Part 2: Policy Assessment |
46 (36.8%) – 50 (40%) The executive summary shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking and problem solving in its explanation of the relevance of the policy to the organization and the impact on both the organization and stakeholders. |
41 (32.8%) – 45 (36%) The executive summary fully addresses the key points in its explanation of the relevance of the policy to the organization and the impact on both the organization and stakeholders. |
36 (28.8%) – 40 (32%) The executive summary lacks depth or clarity in its explanation of the relevance of the policy to the organization and the impact on both the organization and stakeholders. |
0 (0%) – 35 (28%) The executive summary does not address the relevance of the policy to the organization and the impact on both the organization and stakeholders, is inaccurate, missing, or is of poor quality. |
Writing |
14 (11.2%) – 15 (12%) Presentation is well organized, uses scholarly tone, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, follows APA style, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style. |
12 (9.6%) – 13 (10.4%) Presentation is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors. |
10 (8%) – 11 (8.8%) Presentation is somewhat consistent with graduate-level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors. |
0 (0%) – 9 (7.2%) Presentation is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quoting. |