The article name is “Overeducation in the Labor market: a meta analysis.” by Wim Groot

The article name is “Overeducation in the Labor market: a meta analysis.” by Wim Groot

The article name is “Overeducation in the Labor market: a meta analysis.” by Wim Groot, Henriëtte Maassen van den Brink. April 2000

What are the major points/conclusions of the reading?

What is the contribution of the reading? Does it answer a new question? Does it provide a new or different answer on an older question?

How do the authors justify/argue for these major conclusions? With theory? Data? Both? What are the major pieces of their evidence/argument?

Do the conclusions follow from the evidence/argument?

Is there anything confusing to you about the article

How does this research article relate to the material we covered in class? Does it support the material? Contradict the material?

Answer preview The article name is “Overeducation in the Labor market: a meta analysis.” by Wim Groot

The article name is Overeducation in the Labor market a meta analysis. by Wim Groot

APA

960 words