The mandatory minimum sentences pros and cons serve as a debate regarding the foundation of how criminal justice is applied within a society.

The mandatory minimum sentences pros and cons serve as a debate regarding the foundation of how criminal justice is applied within a society.

Mandatory minimum sentences are statutes included in criminal law. They require a convicted criminal to serve a sentence of specific length before being eligible for parole or release. These sentences are usually reserved for crimes that are considered violent or serious, but have been applied to drug possession, gun ownership, and moral vices.

In the United States, the jury is not typically informed of a mandatory minimum penalty because there is a fear that knowing the sentence may affect the determination of innocence or guilt.

The mandatory minimum sentences pros and cons serve as a debate regarding the foundation of how criminal justice is applied within a society. Choose a side– pro or con. Are you in favor or against mandatory minimum sentencing… why or why not? Back up your argument with facts and reasoning.

Answer preview The mandatory minimum sentences pros and cons serve as a debate regarding the foundation of how criminal justice is applied within a society.

The mandatory minimum sentences pros and cons serve as a debate regarding the foundation of how criminal justice is applied within a society.

APA

732 words