Does your peer provide adequate background and context for the subject that he or she is taking on
Use the questions below to make sure that you cover the multiple facets of a good peer review. You may include further information as well, but use these questions as a guide. Be sure to point out specific instances and examples of what is done well and what needs improvement.
Does your peer provide adequate background and context for the subject that he or she is taking on?
Does your peer develop a dominant impression of the subject? In other words, does your peer’s essay present an overall judgement, theme, or message about the individual being profiled?
Is your peer’s thesis statement made clear in 1-2 sentences at the end of the introduction? What is the thesis statement? Does it clearly state the name of the individual being profiled and an overall judgement, theme, or message about this person?
Are your peer’s body paragraphs unified, coherent and developed? Do they have strong topic sentences and smooth concluding sentences that connect the ideas from one paragraph to the next? Do they provide enough examples and descriptive details? Does your peer include dialogue? How could your peer improve his or her body paragraphs?
Does your peer effectively present the information in a way that is clear and logical? Or, do you feel that your peer excludes necessary information? If so, what should be included?
Does your peer effectively round out the paper, bringing it to a clear close? If not, how could your peer improve his or her conclusion?
Answer preview Does your peer provide adequate background and context for the subject that he or she is taking on
APA
292 words