Bullet Point Format Hc 466 Herzing Wk 3 Strategi

By /

Bullet Point Format Hc 466 Herzing Wk 3 Strategi

Unit 3 Assignment 2- Strategic Analysis

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 50
  • Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

Completing a strategic analysis is an important step in the process of creating a long-term strategic plan. In this assessment, apply knowledge of strategic analysis processes to the professional experience used in Units 1 and 2.

Instructions

  • Recall the professional experience summarized in the assessments for Unit 1 and 2.
  • Restate the experience in 1-2 paragraphs, identifying the challenges experienced throughout the planning phase of the change.
  • Using the information presented in this unit regarding strategic analysis, perform an analysis of how the scenario should have been planned through the use of strategic planning.
  • Present the information found by completing the strategic analysis using one of the tools presented in this unit.
  • Create a plan to address the issues.
    • Include a timeline and responsible parties involved. (This may be in a bullet point format).
  • Complete additional research on this topic as necessary. Include at least 2 references, formatted APA style.

Estimated time to complete: 4 hours

a.

Rubric

HC466 – Unit 3 Assignment – Strategic Analysis

HC466 – Unit 3 Assignment – Strategic Analysis
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20.0 pts

Level 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

 18.0 pts

Level 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

 16.0 pts

Level 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

 14.0 pts

Level 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

 12.0 pts

Level 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P
20.0 pts

Level 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 18.0 pts

Level 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 16.0 pts

Level 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 14.0 pts

Level 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

 12.0 pts

Level 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
5.0 pts

Level 5

The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

 4.5 pts

Level 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

 4.0 pts

Level 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

 3.5 pts

Level 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

 3.0 pts

Level 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I
5.0 pts

Level 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

 4.5 pts

Level 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 4.0 pts

Level 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 3.5 pts

Level 2

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 3.0 pts

Level 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 50.0