Budget Proposal Memohc306 Unit Week 306 Memo

By /

Budget Proposal Memohc306 Unit Week 306 Memo

Unit 3 Assignment 1 – Budget Proposal Memo

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 50
  • Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Estimated time to complete: 3 hours

Instructions

You are the financial manager for a small outpatient clinic. Due to the passage of the Affordable Care Act, your organization was required to change insurance companies to meet the guidelines and expectations within the ACA. Salaries increased in FY 2017 due to hiring new personnel. Utilizing the attached balance sheet, create a memo to the Board of Directors regarding the budget proposal for next fiscal year.

  • Using the provided balance sheet, identify three areas of budgetary concern.
  • Create a memo that identifies the three major areas of concern over the past year. For each of the three areas of concern:
    • Use the memo template in Microsoft Word (or another template) to format the memo.
    • Summarize the current status in 75 words or less.
    • Recommend one possible solution for improvement or sustainability for the Board to consider when voting to approve next year’s budget.

Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.

Submit:

  • Budget Proposal Memo

Assignment File(s)

Rubric

HC306 Unit 3 Assignment 1 – Budget Proposal Memo

HC306 Unit 3 Assignment 1 – Budget Proposal Memo
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
15.0 pts

5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

 14.0 pts

4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

 12.0 pts

3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

 11.0 pts

2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

 9.0 pts

1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.

 0.0 pts

0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P
25.0 pts

5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 23.0 pts

4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 20.0 pts

3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 18.0 pts

2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

 15.0 pts

1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

 0.0 pts

0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
5.0 pts

5

The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

 4.5 pts

4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

 4.0 pts

3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

 3.5 pts

2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

 3.0 pts

1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

 0.0 pts

0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I
5.0 pts

5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

 4.5 pts

4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 4.0 pts

3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 3.5 pts

2

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 3.0 pts

1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

 0.0 pts

0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 50.0

PreviousNext