Answering Crr Questions Using Help With This Assi

By /

Answering Crr Questions Using Help With This Assi

  1. How does Gramsci define hegemony? What is the relationship between hegemony, “common sense,” and “consent”?
  2. What is the relationship between hegemony and capitalism?
  3. According to Apple, what is the “hidden curriculum”? What role does hegemony and ideology play in the hidden curriculum?
  4. How does Segall define a (1) grand narrative, (2) myths, and (3) discourse? How are these concepts related to hegemony and the “hidden curriculum”?
  5. How might the hidden curriculum reinforce power structures through schooling/education?

CRR 2 Rubric

CRR 2 Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswer CRR QuestionsAnswered all CRR questions in a thorough Manner.
4.0 to >0.0 pts

Full Marks

Demonstrates a clear understanding of the readings and the author’s main points by answering CRR questions using textual evidence (e.g., direct quotes, and passage paraphrasing) to support these points and explicit citations to the texts.

 0.0 pts

Does not demonstrate

Does not demonstrate a clear understanding of the reading. Does not articulate author’s main points. Does not use textual evidence to support assertions/arguments/analysis. Does not use citations to text.

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeText ConversationsPlace texts in conversation with each other.
3.0 to >0.0 pts

Full Marks

Compares, contrasts, and synthesizes assigned texts in relation to each other to demonstrate expanded understandings of key concepts/theories that a single reading does not provide. For example, “Grande’s theory of Red Pedagogy paired with Marx’s Theory of Historical Materialism allow us to understand x, y, and z about capitalism and schooling.”

 0.0 pts

Does not place texts in conversation

Does not compare, contrast, or synthesize the assigned texts to demonstrate the ways in which the pairing of texts allow us a greater understanding of theories or concepts presented in each text.

3.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConversation with the textsIndividual analysis of texts
3.0 to >0.0 pts

Full Marks

Draws on readings and other content, e.g., current events, in relation to personal experiences to include individual, thoughtful analysis and interpretations of the texts under examination for CRR.

 0.0 pts

Conversation with the texts

Does not draw on the reading, current events, and personal experience to analyze and interpret the text’s theories/key concepts.

3.0 pts

Total Points: 10.0