Accountable Care Organizationshc306 Unit Week 2 3

By /

Accountable Care Organizationshc306 Unit Week 2 3

Unit 2 Assignment 2 – Accountable Care Organizations

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 50
  • Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Estimated time to complete: 3 hours

Instructions

As a graduate of Herzing University’s Healthcare Management program, you have been asked by a colleague to prepare a student handout for a Healthcare Finance class. The professor has asked you to address Accountable Care Organizations within your state. Students will reference this handout as they study and complete assignments related to ACOs.

For this assignment, you will complete the following:

  • Learning objectives outline, 3-5 objectives
  • One-page handout entitled “What is an ACO?”
    • A combination of graphics and text should be used
    • Ensure all text is legible (not too small or placed over a distracting graphic)
    • Professional voice should be used (no “I” statements or personal opinions)
    • Include references in the footnotes section
  • Submit both pages as part of one Word document.

Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.

Submit:

  • Accountable Care Organizations handout and learning objectives

Rubric

HC306 Unit 2 Assignment 2 – Accountable Care Organizations

HC306 Unit 2 Assignment 2 – Accountable Care Organizations
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20.0 pts

5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.

 18.0 pts

4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.

 16.0 pts

3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.

 14.0 pts

2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.

 12.0 pts

1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.

 0.0 pts

0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P
20.0 pts

5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 18.0 pts

4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 16.0 pts

3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

 14.0 pts

2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.

 12.0 pts

1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

 0.0 pts

0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
5.0 pts

5

The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

 4.5 pts

4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

 4.0 pts

3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

 3.5 pts

2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

 3.0 pts

1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

 0.0 pts

0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I
5.0 pts

5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

 4.5 pts

4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 4.0 pts

3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 3.5 pts

2

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

 3.0 pts

1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

 0.0 pts

0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 50.0