Relativist critics claim that universal conceptions of human rights
Relativist critics claim that universal conceptions of human rights “represent an attempt on the part of Western states and societies to impose Western values on non-Western states and societies” (DeLaet 46). Universalists, on the other hand, assert that “[t]o give up on the existence of such [universal] principles is to give up on . . . the common humanity that makes it possible for people of different cultures to deliberate about how we are to order our lives together in an interdependent world” (Glendon 1176). With specific references to the DeLaet and Glendon readings, critically assess the value of both relativist and universal perspectives on human rights. Which perspective do you find most persuasive, and why?
Excellent essays should:
be based on course materials only, and cite these materials
put forward a persuasive argument for one perspective
include a definition of relativist and universalist perspectives
address strongest arguments for and critiques of each perspective
address what’s at stake in this debate (That is, why is this debate relevant/important, according to DeLaet?)
be well structured (i.e. include an introduction, development of argument, acknowledge counterarguments, and a conclusion)
be the product of your own reading and thinking (based on course materials only)
Answer preview Relativist critics claim that universal conceptions of human rights
APA
1248 words