|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProblem/IssueThis should include a description of a specific problem/issue you are having with your IDP person.
|
| 5.0 pts
Excellent Detail
|
4.0 pts
Above Average Detail
|
3.0 pts
Average Detail
|
2.0 pts
Below Average Detail
|
1.0 pts
Hardly Any Detail
|
0.0 pts
Incomplete
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConceptThe concept should be defined clearly and related to how you might improve your problem/issue
|
| 5.0 pts
Excellent
Excellent detail and accurate. Excellent relatedness to issue/problem.
|
4.0 pts
Above Average
Above average detail and accurate. Above average relatedness to issue/problem.
|
3.0 pts
Average
Average detail and accurate. Average relatedness to issue/problem.
|
2.0 pts
Below Average
Below average detail and mostly accurate. Below average relatedness to issue/problem.
|
1.0 pts
Poor
Hardly any detail and inaccuracies. No (or hardly any) relation to problem/issue.
|
0.0 pts
Incomplete
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle IThe article is from a Communication journal. The summary of this article is detailed, accurate, and relevant to the concept. There should be a discussion of a practical application based on the article.
|
| 10.0 pts
Excellent
The article is from a Communication Journal. The summary of the article has an excellent amount of detail, is accurate, and highly relevant to the concept. There is an excellent discussion of a practical application based on the article.
|
8.0 pts
Above Average
The article is from a Communication Journal. The summary of the article has an above average amount of detail, is accurate, and relevant to the concept. There is an above average discussion of a practical application based on the article.
|
6.0 pts
Average
The article is from a Communication Journal. The summary of the article has an average amount of detail, is accurate, and relevant to the concept. There is an average discussion of a practical application based on the article.
|
4.0 pts
Below Average
The article is from a Communication Journal or something like it. The summary of the article has a below average amount of detail, is mostly accurate, and mostly relevant to the concept. There is a below average discussion of a practical application based on the article.
|
2.0 pts
Poor
The article is not from a Communication Journal. The summary of the article has hardly any detail, is inaccurate, and not relevant to the concept. There is hardly any discussion of a practical application based on the article.
|
0.0 pts
Incomplete
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArticle IIThe article is from a Communication journal. The summary of this article is detailed, accurate, and relevant to the concept. There should be a discussion of a practical application based on the article.
|
| 10.0 pts
Excellent
The article is from a Communication Journal. The summary of the article has an excellent amount of detail, is accurate, and highly relevant to the concept. There is an excellent discussion of a practical application based on the article.
|
8.0 pts
Above Average
The article is from a Communication Journal. The summary of the article has an above average amount of detail, is accurate, and relevant to the concept. There is an above average discussion of a practical application based on the article.
|
6.0 pts
Average
The article is from a Communication Journal. The summary of the article has an average amount of detail, is accurate, and relevant to the concept. There is an average discussion of a practical application based on the article.
|
4.0 pts
Below Average
The article is from a Communication Journal or something like it. The summary of the article has a below average amount of detail, is mostly accurate, and mostly relevant to the concept. There is a below average discussion of a practical application based on the article.
|
2.0 pts
Poor
The article is not from a Communication Journal. The summary of the article has hardly any detail, is inaccurate, and not relevant to the concept. There is hardly any discussion of a practical application based on the article.
|
0.0 pts
Incomplete
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlanThere is a detailed plan based on the literature and class discussion about how to address your issue/concept.
|
| 5.0 pts
Excellent
There is a plan with an excellent amount of detail, highly related to the literature/class, and that reflects an excellent amount of thoughtfulness.
|
4.0 pts
Above Average
There is a plan with an above average amount of detail, related to the literature/class, and that reflects an above average amount of thoughtfulness.
|
3.0 pts
Average
There is a plan with an average amount of detail, related to the literature/class, and that reflects an average amount of thoughtfulness.
|
2.0 pts
Below Average
There is a plan with a below average amount of detail, somewhat related to the literature/class, and that reflects a below average amount of thoughtfulness.
|
1.0 pts
Poor
There is a plan with virtually no detail, hardly (if at all) related to the literature/class, and that reflects hardly any thoughtfulness.
|
0.0 pts
Incomplete
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOutcomeThere is a thorough description of the outcome of your plan.
|
| 5.0 pts
Excellent Detail
|
4.0 pts
Above Average Detail
|
3.0 pts
Average Detail
|
2.0 pts
Below Average Detail
|
1.0 pts
Hardly Any Detail
|
0.0 pts
Incomplete
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhat Did you Learn?What did you learn? Why do you think you had the outcome you did? Is there anything you can do differently next time? Is there something you will make sure you repeat?
|
| 5.0 pts
Excellent
Engages in an excellent amount of reflection about what they learned.
|
4.0 pts
Above Average
Engages in an above average amount of reflection about what they learned.
|
3.0 pts
Average
Engages in an average amount of reflection about what they learned.
|
2.0 pts
Below Average
Engages in a below average amount of reflection about what they learned.
|
1.0 pts
Poor
Does not engage in very much reflection about what they learned.
|
0.0 pts
Incomplete
|
|
5.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyleThe references are in APA style. The responses are error-free.
|
| 5.0 pts
Excellent
Excellent spelling, grammar, and APA.
|
4.0 pts
Above Average
Above average spelling, grammar, and APA
|
3.0 pts
Average
Average spelling, grammar, and APA
|
2.0 pts
Below Average
Below average spelling, grammar, and APA
|
1.0 pts
Poor
Poor spelling, grammar, and APA.
|
0.0 pts
No Marks
|
|
5.0 pts
|
