Need 3 references having to do with the attached prospectus
Subject this week ” the cost of employee turnover at the front desk night audit shift in the Hotel industry”
Discussion 2: Annotated Bibliography
In each week of this course, you will research and select three (3) peer-reviewed, scholarly sources to develop an annotated bibliography that you can use in your Doctoral Study. You will need to take the three sources and synthesize the references into a single narrative annotated bibliography that compares/contrasts or supports your study. For example, you may develop three references that will fit into the Nature of the Study (or any other component) and then the synthesized version will help you in developing your Prospectus/Proposal. Please see this week’s Learning Resources for the Sample Annotated Bibliography Template, which you should use to complete your annotated bibliography.
BY DAY 3
Post your synthesized annotated bibliography narrative that includes an explanation of how these references relate to onrospectus or more components of your Doctoral Study and incorporates specific references to the Doctoral Study Rubric.
Refer to the Week 1 Discussion 2 Rubric for specific grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use this rubric to assess your work.
ELEMENT 1: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY (POST AND ATTACH DOCUMENT)—
SUPERIOR 6.6 (30%) points
Student posts and includes an attachment of his/her annotated bibliography which includes three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources that are thoroughly synthesized into a single, well-written narrative annotated bibliography that explicitly compares/contrasts or supports his/her study. A thorough and detailed explanation of how the sources relate to his/her study is evident.
EXCELLENT 6.27 (28.5%) points
Student posts and includes an attachment of his/her annotated bibliography which includes three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources that are thoroughly synthesized into a single, well-written narrative annotated bibliography that explicitly compares/contrasts or supports his/her study. A detailed explanation of how the sources relate to his/her study is evident. One or two minor details are missing or lack clarity.
SATISFACTORY 5.61 (25.5%) points
Student posts and includes an attachment of his/her annotated bibliography which includes three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources that are synthesized into a single narrative annotated bibliography that explicitly compares/contrasts or supports his/her study. An explanation with some details of how the sources relate to his/her study is evident.
MARGINAL 4.95 (22.5%) points
Student posts and includes an attachment of his/her annotated bibliography which includes three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources that are somewhat synthesized into a single narrative annotated bibliography that compares/contrasts or supports his/her study. A cursory statement of how the sources relate to his/her study is evident.
UNSATISFACTORY 3.3 (15%) points
Does not meet minimal standards and/or is posted late.
NOT SUBMITTED 0 (0%) points
Did not submit element.
ELEMENT 2: FOLLOW-UP RESPONSES—
SUPERIOR 8.8 (40%) points
On Day 5 and on Day 7, student’s responses fully contribute to the quality of interaction by offering constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, and/or additional resources related to peers’ annotated bibliography. Student demonstrates active engagement with more than one peer on at least two days in the discussion forum (or with Instructor if there are no other peers/posts).
EXCELLENT 8.36 (38%) points
On Day 5 and on Day 7, student shares some constructive critique, suggestions, in-depth questions, and/or additional resources related to peers’ annotated bibliography, but more depth and/or clarity around ideas is needed. Student demonstrates active engagement with more than one peer on at least two days in the discussion forum (or with Instructor if there are no other peers/posts).
SATISFACTORY 7.48 (34%) points
Student did not post on Day 5 and on Day 7, but he/she did engage with at least one peer (or with Instructor if there are no other peers/posts) during the week offering constructive feedback related to peers’ annotated bibliography.
MARGINAL 6.6 (30%) points
Student posts to at least one peer (or with Instructor if there are no other peers/posts) but response is cursory and/or off topic.
UNSATISFACTORY 4.4 (20%) points
Does not meet minimal standards and/or student posted late.
NOT SUBMITTED 0 (0%) points
Did not submit element.
ELEMENT 3: WRITTEN DELIVERY STYLE & GRAMMAR—
SUPERIOR 3.3 (15%) points
Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are no spelling or grammar errors.
EXCELLENT 3.13 (14.25%) points
Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are one or two minor errors in spelling or grammar.
SATISFACTORY 2.81 (12.75%) points
Student mostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are some errors in spelling or grammar.
MARGINAL 2.48 (11.25%) points
Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style.
UNSATISFACTORY 1.65 (7.5%) points
Does not meet minimal standards.
NOT SUBMITTED 0 (0%) points
Did not submit element.
ELEMENT 4: FORMAL AND APPROPRIATE DOCUMENTATION OF EVIDENCE, ATTRIBUTION OF IDEAS (APA CITATIONS)—
SUPERIOR 3.3 (15%) points
Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors.
EXCELLENT 3.13 (14.25%) points
Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. There are one or two minor errors in APA style or format.
SATISFACTORY 2.81 (12.75%) points
Student mostly adheres to scholarly reference requirements and/or mostly adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Some errors in APA format and style are evident.
MARGINAL 2.48 (11.25%) points
Student demonstrates weak or inconsistent adherence scholarly reference requirements and/or weak or inconsistent adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents and lists of charts, etc. Several errors in APA format and style are evident.
UNSATISFACTORY 1.65 (7.5%) points
Does not meet minimal standards.
NOT SUBMITTED 0 (0%) points
Did not submit element.
NA
ATTACHMENTS
week8assignmentlima_gonzalez_c__
