Part 2 1Not Submitted0 Critique Of Research Studi

70.0 %Content

35.0 %Quantitative Methods: Protection of human rights, research design, population and sample, data collection and measurement, and procedures.

None

Critique is missing for quantitative methods.

Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for all five sections of quantitative methods OR the critique is thorough but is missing three components. Critique is unsupported with evidence.

Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for all five sections of quantitative methods OR the critique is thorough but is missing two components. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.

Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for all five sections of quantitative methods OR the critique is thorough but is missing a component. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for all five sections of quantitative methods. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

35.0 %Qualitative Methods: Protection of participants’ rights, research design and research tradition, sampling and setting, data collection, procedures, and enhancement of trustworthiness.

None

Critique is missing for qualitative methods.

Critique is vague and addresses some guidelines and criteria for all six sections of qualitative methods OR the critique is thorough but is missing three components. Critique is unsupported with evidence.

Critique is brief and addresses some guidelines and criteria for all six sections of qualitative methods OR the critique is thorough but is missing two components. Critique is somewhat supported with relevant evidence.

Critique is detailed and addresses most guidelines and criteria for all six sections of qualitative methods OR the critique is thorough but is missing a component. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for all six sections of qualitative methods. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

20.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

None

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech.

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (1- inch margins; 12-point-font; double-spaced; Times New Roman, Arial, or Courier)

None

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)

None

No reference page is included. No citations are used.

Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.

Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct.

In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage