Mary Folletthenry Mintzbergmax Weberfederick Assi
From Manager’s Bookshelf
https://reader.yuzu.com/#/books/9780133560251/cfi/…
Username:Dbrinson@troy.edu
Password: Brinson!2
Part 2
- Reading 1: The Practice of Management, Peter F. Drucker, summarized by John D. Stavig and Shaker A. Zahra 27
- Reading 2: The One Minute Manager, Kenneth Blanchard and Spencer Johnson, summarized by Charles C. Manz 31
- Reading 3: Out of the Crisis, W. Edwards Deming, summarized by William B. Gartner and M. James Naughton 35
- Reading 8: Competitive Advantage, Michael E. Porter, summarized by Sara A. Morris 56
Part 3
- Reading 3: How the Mighty Fall, Jim Collins, summarized by Tanya Pietz 78
From The Troy Global Campus Library
Collins, Jim (May 5, 2008). The secret of enduring greatness. Fortune. New York: 157(9), 72.
and
find articles on the writings of or summaries of the writings of the following management theorists:
- Mary Follett
- Henry Mintzberg
- Max Weber
- Federick Taylor
Complete the following assignment:
- Using the assigned readings in the text, and the assigned readings from the Troy Global Campus Library and
- Using the additional research from the Troy Global Campus Library
Prepare a 3 to 5 page critical essay that addresses the following topic:
Identify the management philosophies of at least TWO of the following theorists: Drucker, Blanchard, Deming, Porter, Collins AND least TWO of the following theorists: Follett, Minztberg, Weber, Taylor.
Do NOT compare the philosophies of these theorists to each other in this paper.
Your assignment will be evaluated with the Writing Assessment and Evaluation rubric.
Rubric
Writing Assessment & Evaluation
Criteria | Ratings | Pts | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponds fully to the assignment |
|
4.0 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresents a manifest topic statement identifying the issue and the position |
|
4.0 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExercises good critical thinking |
|
3.0 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExpresses its purpose clearly and persuasively throughout |
|
4.0 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInvokes and uses disciplinary facts correctly |
|
3.0 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvides adequate supporting arguments with reasons, evidence, and examples |
|
3.0 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIs focused, well organized, and unified |
|
3.0 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUses direct language that is appropriate for the audience |
|
2.0 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInvokes discerning sources when appropriate |
|
2.0 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCorrectly documents and cites sources |
|
4.0 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIs free of errors in grammar, punctuation, word choice, spelling, and format |
|
4.0 pts |
||||
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDisplays originality and creativity |
|
4.0 pts |
||||
Total Points: 40.0 |