Cite References Currently Hu Gap Action Plan For

By /

Cite References Currently Hu Gap Action Plan For

From the gap analysis (this is attached) identify the key points of the action plan.

  • The action plan consists of the recommendations for change
  • The action plan is presented in a table format [see template and example below].
  • The action plan for changing practice addresses:
  • Recommendations for changing
  • Rationale for the proposed actions, citing sources in APA format [no quotations]
  • Factors currently present that will facilitate implementation of the recommendations
  • Barriers to implementing recommendations

Template: Action Plan for Change to Achieve/Support Best Practice

Recommendations

Rationale

(Cite reference)

Facilitators to Implementation

Barriers to Implementation

(Steps to change to Best Practices)

(Summary statement; cite references)

(Currently present)

(Currently present)

STEP VII: Cost Analysis/Economic Implications

  • An explanation of the cost implications of the project (e.g. cost savings) in a narrative and/or table.
  • Make sure that you cite your sources of the cost information in the body of the cost analysis and on the reference list.
  • Sometimes the “cost” is not an obvious cost related to equipment or supplies. At times the economic implication is less tangible, for example the cost to incur poor patient satisfaction, or unsatisfied nurses.

STEP VIII: Conclusions and Recommendations

  • Conclusions from your findings on this project are to be described. What did you learn?
  • Future recommendations for health care/ nursing practice and research are to be made. What is the logical next step that needs to be taken? For example, often students discover that a limitation of the project is lack of research that supports best practice. The logical next step would be to recommend that more research is needed in this area before practice can be changed.
  • Recommendations to support the bill or not and why.
  • This should be in the form of a narrative.

Best Practice Guidelines

What is actually happening

Professionals in the same field should guide the caregivers dealing with cerebrovascular patients at homes. This action is a way of controlling or minimizing the prevalence of post-stroke disability cases among Black-American patients (Tsai et al., 2015).

After they are released from their treatment places, the cerebrovascular patients are subjected to caregivers who are often non-professionals. The caregivers also get little or no guidance from the health care professionals regarding the right care that should be availed to the patients. As a consequence, the patients become vulnerable to post-treatment challenges such as post-stroke disability.

There should be a provision of relevant guidance and counseling to the family caregivers that attend to the cerebrovascular patients away from the medical treatment centers. Successful implementation of this practice helps to curb the prevalence of post-stroke disability among Black American patients as well as the rest of the patients in the society. The primary objective of this plan is to ensure the performance of reliable services by home caregivers (Skolarus et al., 2017).

There is a deficiency of the tips that should be followed by home caregivers for cerebrovascular patients. After their terms in hospitals, the patients are released to their or friends who are limited in information regarding the treatment of cerebrovascular health concerns. For these reasons, the caregivers guide and assist the patients following the limited information on the cerebrovascular illness.

The needs of family caregivers should be assessed by the authorities and professionals in the field of health care provision. Assessing the needs of the caregivers is essential because it identifies the deficiencies that affect the services they give to the cerebrovascular patients after their release from the health care centers. The primary objectives of this action are to identify and address the understanding of family caregivers regarding the transitional care needed by African-American cerebrovascular patients (Tsai et al., 2015).

Currently, family caregivers are tasked with providing reliable transitional care to African-American cerebrovascular patients. Following the results of the study works completed regarding the understanding of the public regarding the cerebrovascular health issues, it is evident that Black Americans are less informed on the cerebrovascular health issues compared to the Whites. As a result of this situation, blacks are more prone to cerebrovascular health challenges than Whites. Also, they are characterized by more family needs, chronic illnesses, and transitional care.

There is a need for strengthening self-management approaches among the Black American communities. The approaches used should address the strengths found in social environments. The basic objective of ensuring these actions is to reduce the vulnerability of Black Americans to the prevailing risk factors related to cerebrovascular illness (Sajatovic et al., 2017).

Currently, Black Americans are less informed about the ways of self-management in heed of avoiding stroke risk factors. The Whites are more informed about the social environment strengths that can aid in the prevention of stroke-related illnesses. As a result, more Blacks succumb in the cerebrovascular illness than the Whites.

References

Sajatovic, M., Tatsuoka, C., Welter, E., Colon-Zimmermann, K., Blixen, C., Perzynski, A. T., Amato, S., Cage, J., Sams, J., Moore, S. M., Pundik, S., Sundararajan, S., Modlin, C., Sila, C. (2017). A Targeted Self-Management Approach for Reducing Stroke Risk Factors in African American Men Who Have Had a Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack. National Library of Medicine.

Skolarus, L. E., Freedman, V, A., Feng, C., Burke, J M. (2017). African American Stroke Survivors More Caregiving Time, but Less Caregiving Burden.

Tsai, P. C., Yip, P. K., Tai, J. J., & Lou, M. F. (2015). Needs of family caregivers of stroke patients: a longitudinal study of caregivers’ perspectives. Patient Preference and Adherence, Vol. 9. 449–457.