Page Referencethe Memo Offers Cultural Fit In Eli
In your memo, please answer the following questions.
1) In Rivera’s study, what criteria do elite firms use to hire their employees?
2) Do the criteria promote meritocracy (reward systems based on one’s ability and achievement) or inequality (reward system based on privilege and discrimination)? Explain your position with evidence from the article.
**When you include direct quotes or rephrase specific ideas from the article, please indicate the specific page number(s) where you can find the quotes/ideas in parenthesis**
Your memo will be evaluated based on the following criteria:
1) In response to the first question, the memo demonstrates a good understanding of the key ideas in the reading (3pts).
2) In response to the second question, the memo states a position (1pt) and offers an explanation of the position (3 pts) using appropriate evidence from the article (2 pts).
3) Appropriate heading and file name (1pt).
Total: 10 Points
Rubric
Memo 2
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponse to #1Understanding of the hiring criteria
|
| 3 pts
Excellent
The memo demonstrates an excellent understanding of the key ideas from the reading.
|
2.5 pts
Good
The memo demonstrates a good understanding of the key ideas from the reading.
|
2 pts
Adequate
The memo demonstrates an adequate understanding of the key ideas from the reading.
|
1.5 pts
Weak
The memo demonstrates a weak understanding of the key ideas from the reading.
|
1 pts
Poor
The memo reflects many confusions about the reading.
|
0 pts
Missing Criteria
The memo is missing a discussion of the criteria.
|
|
3 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponse to #2A statement of the position
|
| 1 pts
Clear Position
The memo clearly states a position.
|
0.5 pts
Unclear Position
The memo includes an unclear position.
|
0 pts
Missing Position
The memo is missing a statement of the position.
|
|
1 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponse to #2An explanation of the position
|
| 3 pts
Excellent
The memo offers a clear explanation of the position.
|
2.5 pts
Good
The memo offers a good explanation of the position.
|
2 pts
Adequate
The memo offers an adequate explanation of the position.
|
1.5 pts
Weak
The memo offers a weak explanation of the position.
|
1 pts
Poor
The explanation requires an extensive clarification.
|
0 pts
Missing Explanation
The memo is missing an explanation.
|
|
3 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponse to #2Evidence of the position
|
| 2 pts
Excellent
The memo offers an effective supporting evidence with a specific page reference from the article.
|
1.5 pts
Excellent but no page reference
The memo offers an effective supporting discussion but is missing specific page reference from the article.
|
1.5 pts
Good with page reference
The memo offers good supporting evidence with specific page reference from the article.
|
1 pts
Good but no page reference
The memo offers good supporting evidence but is missing specific page reference from the article.
|
1 pts
Weak with page reference
The memo offers weak supporting evidence with page reference.
|
0.5 pts
Weak with no reference
The memo offers weak evidence and is missing specific page reference.
|
0 pts
No evidence
The memo is missing evidence.
|
|
2 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHeading and File NameHeading and file name follow guidelines.
|
| 1 pts
Full Marks
The heading and the file name follow the guidelines.
|
0.5 pts
Half Marks
The heading or the file name does not follow the guidelines.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
1 pts
|
|
Total Points: 10
|
