Prior Right Anterior Wall Remington College Dynam

Competency

Evaluate factors integral to clinical reasoning.

Explain the impact of relational inquiry when recognizing and analyzing cues to action in the process of clinical reasoning.

Integrate modes of inquiry to generate and evaluate hypotheses in the context of clinical reasoning.

Determine appropriate responses when integrating situated cognition into clinical reasoning.

Modify clinical judgement within an iterative, outcome-based cycle of clinical reasoning and client needs.

Scenario

You are a student in the last term of a BSN Program. You are preparing for an end of term exam. To help you prepare, your instructor developed three real world clinical scenarios to provide opportunities for you to apply clinical reasoning and clinical judgement. The instructor stated, “You received reports on these clients. Decide which one you need to see first and then make appropriate nursing decisions based on relevant information to promote positive client outcomes.”

The three scenarios include:

Patient 1

JR is a 55 yr old male admitted 8 hrs ago for 24 hr hold to evaluate for possible myocardial infarction. Serial troponins within normal range, and 12 lead ECG indicate evidence of prior right anterior wall myocardial damage

Patient 2

EH is a 40 yr old admitted within the past hour with acute onset severe right upper quandrant pain and vomiting for the past 36 hr. Waiting on labs, ECG monitoring showing occasional premature ventricular contraction (PVCs)

Patient 3

BW is a 21 yr old male athlete admitted yesterday with fever of 103 and diagnosis of influenza. He rested well overnight. Morning chest xray revealed mild infiltrates in left lower lobe

Instructions

Record your answers to these statements.

• Rank the three scenarios provided in order of priority related to which client you will assess first, second and third.
• Defend your selection for the three ranked scenarios.
• Review the data below for the priority client to determine what to assess first.

Chest X-ray no abnormalities noted

Abdominal X-ray :diffuse gas throughout the small intestine

Hyperactive bowel sounds in all 4 quadrants and abdomen painful to touch

Pain level 10/10

Sodium (Na+) 147 mmol/L

Potassium (K+) 2.9 mmol/L

Chloride (Cl-) 100 mmol/L

Magnesium (Mg2+) 1.4 mg/dL

Calcium (Ca2+) 9.2 mg/dL

Phosphorus (P+) 2.3 mg/dL

Glucose 188 mg/dL

Serum albumin 3.0 g/dL

Amylase 185 unit/L

Serum Creatinine 0.5 mg/dL

BUN 15 mg/dL

Alkaline Phos. 155 unit/L • Protein 8.6 g/dL Bilirubin 3.5 mg/dL

Formulate three hypotheses based on cues provided

Select the priority hypothesis

Defend your selection

Describe an evaluation plan for the priority hypothesis based on expected client outcomes

Describe the next steps in the clinical judgement model including:

• Actions if satisfied with client outcomes
• Actions if not satisfied with client outcomes

Provide headings for each section to keep it organized

Accurately ranks the three scenarios provided in order of priority related to which client will be assessed first, second and third. Provides a clear and detailed defense for the three ranked scenarios including internal and external cue recognition.

Formulate three hypotheses based on cues provided and select a priority hypothesis including a clearly stated, detailed defense for your priority selection.

Provide a clearly stated, detailed description of an evaluation plan for the priority hypothesis based on expected client outcomes.

Provide clearly stated, detailed description of the next steps in the clinical judgement model including if satisfied with client outcomes and if not satisfied with client outcomes.

Do not use 1st person in scholarly writing. Use 3rd person only. APA format. Formal style reflected throughout the document, including no spelling, grammar, or APA format errors. Adequate references with adequate in text citation. Please do this assignment using only research published within the past 5 years. Plagiarism free