7 Things Annotated Bibliography Usc Status Of Med

I want a 7 things annotated bibliography paper

I posted the file of my Thesis follow that thesis on the bibliography and put the theses on the top of the paper so I can see what are you talking about in the annotated bibliography this is how my final paper should look like but for now I just need the Annotated bibl

Organize your paper according to the following structure, addressing many (but not necessarily all) of the questions shown:

Introduce – and justify – your study. This section aids the reader in understanding the objectives of this analysis. Why is this [social group] a legitimate focus for study? Why is [type of media content] chosen for examining portrayals of [social group]? What is at stake in carrying out this study? Often, it is helpful to craft a thesis statement as part of your introduction.

• Describe the historical background of your subject, using reputable sources. Has [social group] been the object of discrimination or devaluation in society? Or, on the other hand, is [social group] a privileged, highly esteemed, and/or sought-after group in society? What is the history of representations of [social group] in [type of media content]? If these portrayals have shifted course over time, how and why did the changes occur? Are there any events, controversies, or debates that brought issues concerning the media’s portrayal of [social group] to the forefront of the public’s attention?

• What is the current status of media representations for [social group]? Does the diversity of media representations for [social group] resemble the diversity of this group in the “real world”? Is it necessary or relevant for the media – especially the specific type of media content you’ve chosen – to try to achieve a diverse range of images of this group? If [social group] was the object of stereotyping in the past, would you say that progress has been made more recently? Again, try to find reputable sources of information to describe the current picture of media portrayals. Ideally, you’ll locate both qualitative and quantitative data concerning the above areas.
• Then, identify, describe, and evaluate at least three key cases of diversity (or lack thereof) in [type of media content]? Justify your choices. Describe the cases thoroughly and accurately. Set forth your criteria for interpreting and evaluating the cases. For example, if you decide that one or more of the cases show positive treatment of [social group], be sure to indicate how you define “positive” and “negative” portrayals, and the specific dimensions used in making these judgments of media content. Once more, it is very helpful to find one or more published sources for deriving and applying these criteria – rather than relying on your subjective impressions.
• Discuss the real-world consequences, if any, of the patterns you’ve found. For example: Are there ethical consequences, especially in terms of issues of fairness and avoidance of harm? Is there evidence that people are influenced by the patterns you’ve analyzed? If so, who? And what sort of influence? Is it possible that different audiences interpret these media portrayals differently?

Summarize your findings and your position on this subject. Then, move to the Engagement stage. What should you do with the analysis and insights you’ve produced? What should others do? What actions do you recommend now and in the future? How realistic are your recommendations?