Should U.S. law distinguish between the legitimate and terrorist activities of organizations
Capstone Case: Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
This case concerns the federal law that makes it a crime to “knowingly provid[e] material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization.” Plaintiffs claimed that they wished to provide support for the humanitarian and political activities of two international organizations in the form of monetary contributions, other tangible aid, legal training, and political advocacy, but that they could not do so for fear of prosecution under the federal law.
Should U.S. law distinguish between the legitimate and terrorist activities of organizations for purposes of determining whether a person may provide support?
What if the secretary of state were to declare thousands of foreign organizations to be terroristic in nature, including those that advocate violence but have not committed any violence?
500 word minimum count. must use in text citations. have references within the past 7 years.
Answer preview Should U.S. law distinguish between the legitimate and terrorist activities of organizations
APA
567 words