28571 Points Concept Module 09 Written Assignmen

By /

28571 Points Concept Module 09 Written Assignmen

Please use the concept map to plan care for Mr. Jackson. Mr. Jackson is a 38-year-old African American that presents with an altered level of consciousness (ALOC). He has been having headaches for the last three months but due to a hectic work schedule he has not been able to go to see his medical practitioner. During his last visit two years ago, his blood pressure was slightly elevated, but he never followed up. Upon arrival to the ED a CT scan is completed and it shows a large bleed near the frontal lobe. What should Mr. Jackson’s plan of care include?

Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: Concept map: Stroke

Novice Competent Proficient
ORGANIZATION Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Disorganized or illogical format. Examples may or may not be linked or connected

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Minimally organized, logical format. Examples may not be clearly linked or connected

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

Well organized, logical format that provides examples that are clearly linked or connected

Feedback:

CONTENT & MECHANICS

Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Minimal number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates marginal conceptual understanding. Information may not be clearly presented & flow through assignment. Errors in spelling, grammar and/or citations

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Partial number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates acceptable conceptual understanding. Information clearly presented & flows through assignment. Errors in spelling, grammar and/or citations

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

Contains appropriate number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates superior conceptual understanding. Information clearly presented & flows through assignment. Correct spelling, grammar & citations

Feedback:

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY

Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Concept map detail does not show pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. Excludes more than one disease if related

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Concept map shows limited pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. May overlook more than one disease if related (ex: renal failure secondary to HTN)

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

Concept map detail must show pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. May include more than one disease if related (ex: renal failure secondary to HTN)

Feedback:

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS

Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Subjective & objective data not included

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Subjective & objective data partially included

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

Subjective & objective data included

Feedback:

NURSING DIAGNOSIS

Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Absence of NANDA diagnosis, or does not include ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Less than two NANDA diagnosis or may not include ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

Two NANDA diagnosis, including ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’

Feedback:

NURSING INTERVENTIONS

Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Less than 2 nursing interventions for each diagnosis

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Less than 4 but more than 2 nursing interventions for each diagnosis

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

At least 4 nursing interventions for each diagnosis

Feedback:

GOALS

Points: 0.33 (4.71428%)

Less than one per nursing diagnosis. Not formatted as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)

Feedback:

Points: 0.67 (9.57142%)

Less than one per nursing diagnosis. Format as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)

Feedback:

Points: 1 (14.28571%)

One per nursing diagnosis. Format as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)

Feedback:

ORGANIZATION—

Levels of Achievement:

0.33 (4.71428%) points

Disorganized or illogical format. Examples may or may not be linked or connected

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Minimally organized, logical format. Examples may not be clearly linked or connected

1 (14.28571%) points

Well organized, logical format that provides examples that are clearly linked or connected

Feedback:

CONTENT & MECHANICS—

Levels of Achievement:

0.33 (4.71428%) points

Minimal number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates marginal conceptual understanding. Information may not be clearly presented & flow through assignment. Errors in spelling, grammar and/or citations

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Partial number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates acceptable conceptual understanding. Information clearly presented & flows through assignment. Errors in spelling, grammar and/or citations

1 (14.28571%) points

Contains appropriate number of concepts. Current & applicable information; demonstrates superior conceptual understanding. Information clearly presented & flows through assignment. Correct spelling, grammar & citations

Feedback:

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY—

Levels of Achievement:

0.33 (4.71428%) points

Concept map detail does not show pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. Excludes more than one disease if related

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Concept map shows limited pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. May overlook more than one disease if related (ex: renal failure secondary to HTN)

1 (14.28571%) points

Concept map detail must show pathophysiology for pertinent disease process/processes. May include more than one disease if related (ex: renal failure secondary to HTN)

Feedback:

CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS—

Levels of Achievement:

0.33 (4.71428%) points

Subjective & objective data not included

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Subjective & objective data partially included

1 (14.28571%) points

Subjective & objective data included

Feedback:

NURSING DIAGNOSIS—

Levels of Achievement:

0.33 (4.71428%) points

Absence of NANDA diagnosis, or does not include ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Less than two NANDA diagnosis or may not include ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’

1 (14.28571%) points

Two NANDA diagnosis, including ‘related to’ and ‘evidenced by’

Feedback:

NURSING INTERVENTIONS—

Levels of Achievement:

0.33 (4.71428%) points

Less than 2 nursing interventions for each diagnosis

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Less than 4 but more than 2 nursing interventions for each diagnosis

1 (14.28571%) points

At least 4 nursing interventions for each diagnosis

Feedback:

GOALS—

Levels of Achievement:

0.33 (4.71428%) points

Less than one per nursing diagnosis. Not formatted as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)

0.67 (9.57142%) points

Less than one per nursing diagnosis. Format as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)

1 (14.28571%) points

One per nursing diagnosis. Format as SMART goals (specific, measurable, attainable/agreeable, realistic, time-based)

Feedback:

Name:Concept map: Stroke